Yamaha UX50BL
General discussion about piano makes, problems with pianos, or just seeking advice.
Moderators: Feg, Gill the Piano, Melodytune
Yamaha UX50BL
Hello from a keen amateur (with 2 young children who I hope will also come to play when they are a little older).
We've been looking to buy and looked at a range of upright pianos around the £4000-mark, but keep coming back to the benchmark of the Yamaha U3, particularly those form the mid-late 1980s.
This post is not intended to be a rehash of the old (and well made) arguments for or against buying a Yamaha vs alternatives, or indeed a refurbished U3 vs. a new B2 etc. Rest assured, I have read these posts, and played the options, and, speaking purely personally, have come to the decision that a refurbished U3 from a reputable dealer is the right choice for us.
However...
...I have found a Yamaha UX50BL from 1989 for sale. I haven't had a chance to play it yet, but will do so very soon, I hope. There is very little out there on the internet about these, but from what I can find out (e.g. http://www.keyartspianohouston.com/file ... eries3.pdf) this is a 'Special X series' piano based upon the U3, but with the X-series bracing, agraffes and other high end materials.
Does anyone know how many of these were made, and why Yamaha stopped making them?
Price-wise the UX50BL seems reasonable - the dealer in question has a good reputation and is very clear on what exact work is carried out on each piano. When I asked more about this piano, he realised that he had 'mis-priced' it and immediately raised the public price on his website by 10%, but to his very great credit, he is honouring the original price for me if I wish to purchase after I have played the piano (hopefully v soon).
Has anyone out there any experience with these pianos, compared to the 'standard' U3 of the same era? I appreciate that asking for like-for-like comparisons is silly since the variation between U3s from the late 1980s will be huge, but from a technical perspective, do the changes in build all add up to a very different piano? Since we want to own this piano for many years, do any of you have a sense of the build quality vs. a U3 of the same age? Is there anything I should be wary of? (In particular, some people seem on these message boards seem to suggest that the UX series doesn't really vary that much from the standard U series).
Many thanks and best wishes to you all.
We've been looking to buy and looked at a range of upright pianos around the £4000-mark, but keep coming back to the benchmark of the Yamaha U3, particularly those form the mid-late 1980s.
This post is not intended to be a rehash of the old (and well made) arguments for or against buying a Yamaha vs alternatives, or indeed a refurbished U3 vs. a new B2 etc. Rest assured, I have read these posts, and played the options, and, speaking purely personally, have come to the decision that a refurbished U3 from a reputable dealer is the right choice for us.
However...
...I have found a Yamaha UX50BL from 1989 for sale. I haven't had a chance to play it yet, but will do so very soon, I hope. There is very little out there on the internet about these, but from what I can find out (e.g. http://www.keyartspianohouston.com/file ... eries3.pdf) this is a 'Special X series' piano based upon the U3, but with the X-series bracing, agraffes and other high end materials.
Does anyone know how many of these were made, and why Yamaha stopped making them?
Price-wise the UX50BL seems reasonable - the dealer in question has a good reputation and is very clear on what exact work is carried out on each piano. When I asked more about this piano, he realised that he had 'mis-priced' it and immediately raised the public price on his website by 10%, but to his very great credit, he is honouring the original price for me if I wish to purchase after I have played the piano (hopefully v soon).
Has anyone out there any experience with these pianos, compared to the 'standard' U3 of the same era? I appreciate that asking for like-for-like comparisons is silly since the variation between U3s from the late 1980s will be huge, but from a technical perspective, do the changes in build all add up to a very different piano? Since we want to own this piano for many years, do any of you have a sense of the build quality vs. a U3 of the same age? Is there anything I should be wary of? (In particular, some people seem on these message boards seem to suggest that the UX series doesn't really vary that much from the standard U series).
Many thanks and best wishes to you all.
- Colin Nicholson
- Executive Poster
- Posts: 1704
- Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 19:15
- Location: Morpeth, Northumberland
- Contact:
Re: Yamaha UX50BL
Post by Colin Nicholson »
Both reputable pianos.
Check if agraffes in the bass or throughout
Check if agraffes in the bass or throughout
AA Piano Tuners UK
Colin Nicholson Dip. Mus. CMIT CLCM PTLLS
Piano tuning & repairs. Full UK restoration service
http://www.aatuners.com
Tuition ~ Accompaniment ~ Weddings
http://www.pianotime1964.com
Member of The Guild of Master Craftsmen
Colin Nicholson Dip. Mus. CMIT CLCM PTLLS
Piano tuning & repairs. Full UK restoration service
http://www.aatuners.com
Tuition ~ Accompaniment ~ Weddings
http://www.pianotime1964.com
Member of The Guild of Master Craftsmen
Post Reply
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
- Main Site Menu
-
Home
Piano Tuners
Piano Makers
Piano Teachers
Piano Accompanists
Piano Entertainers
Piano Shops
Piano Removals
French Polishers
Piano Rehearsal Rooms
Piano Hire
Pianos For Sale
Piano Parts
Piano History
Piano Forum
Piano Music
Piano Events
Advertise
Advanced Search Contact Site Admin
Help with a listing
Sitemap
Main Terms And Conditions
-
- Recent Listings